View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Agile Three Amigos |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-2 h | 15-30 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-8 | 3 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | TeamCollaborationAgile |