View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Operations Barrier Analysis | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Operations MORT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | Root causeSafetyIncident | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident |



