View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 20-40 min pro Story | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 15-200 | 3-6 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | LearningDialogueFacilitation |