methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview1-2 h je Session1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-10 InterviewsBased on research questionNutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesUsability Issues, Severity List, RecommendationsInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
ValidationUXPrototype
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods