View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() UX Research First-click Testing | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-2 Tage | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | Based on research question | 10-30 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | Information architectureNavigationFindability | UXNavigationFindabilityValidation | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |



