View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Solution InterviewRisk StormingUsability TestingATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Architecture Risk Storming |  UX Research Usability Testing |  Architecture ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. | ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-90 min | 1-2 h je Session | Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 4-12 | Based on research question | Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations | Prioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | ValidationUXPrototype | ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders |