View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min | 4-5 Tage | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 3-10 | 5-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |