View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing | ![]() Engineering Goal Question Metric |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 3-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | GQM Table, Metric Profiles |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






