View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 60-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 10-50 | 4-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |