View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 6-30 Experten | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |