View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  UX Research Surveys |  Innovation Design Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 15-45 min | 3-14 Tage | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 1-3 | 50+ | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | QuantitativeResearchValidation | InnovationPrototypeResearch |