View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 15-45 min | 45-75 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 1-3 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |