View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Soft Systems Methodology |  Team Design Team Cognitive Load Assessment |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Question Burst |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action. | When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-3 Tage | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-12 | 3-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda | Cognitive Load Profile, Action List | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning Prompts |
Tagsno overlap | Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking | TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking |