methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration of Team Cognitive Load Assessment with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Cognitive Load Assessment
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage60-90 min15-30 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-153-122-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaCognitive Load Profile, Action ListQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods