methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration of a calibrated five-by-five risk matrix with response cards.
Decision Making
Risk Matrix
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration of Cost of Delay with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Cost of Delay
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage30-60 min1-4 h90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
5-153-103-83-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaRisk Matrix, Top Risk ListChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanCoD Table, Prioritization Sequence
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment
RiskDecisionSensemaking
PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision
Add more methods