methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighLow
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage45-90 min0.5-2 Tage20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
5-153-1020-500+1-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsSession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods