methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage45-90 min60-180 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
5-153-104-202-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
Add more methods