methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration of a Polarity Map with two poles and four quadrants
Systems Thinking
Polarity Mapping
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage1-2 hHalber Tag bis 2 Tage60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
5-153-1215-2004-20
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaPolarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance ActionsSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods