View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Soft Systems MethodologyDelegation PokerTeam Cognitive Load AssessmentSailboat Retrospective
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Soft Systems Methodology | ![]() Facilitation Delegation Poker | ![]() Team Design Team Cognitive Load Assessment | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-10 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Cognitive Load Profile, Action List | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking | AutonomyRolesTeam | TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement |



