methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration of Futures Wheel with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Futures Wheel
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage60-180 min60-120 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
5-154-203-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesFutures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic SignalsChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
ForesightSystems thinkingSignals
RiskDecisionSensemaking
Add more methods