methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage45-120 min1-3 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
5-152-61-83-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods