methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
0.5-3 Tage45-90 min15-45 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
5-152-51-34-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change AgendaA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisADR File, Decision Log, RationaleCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods