methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-2 Tage1-2 Tage45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
NutzertrafficBased on research question10-302-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Information architectureNavigationFindability
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods