View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Smoke Test |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |