methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
0.5-2 Tage30–60 min per interview1-2 Tage30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
6-121 participant per interview10-501-5
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership MapInterview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryKano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List
Tagsno overlap
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
Add more methods