View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Operations Scatter Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-4 h | 2-6 h | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-12 | 1-5 | 3-10 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, Hypothesenliste |
Tagsno overlap | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Root causeQualityVisualization |



