View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min pro Feature | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |



