methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scrum with its method-specific working model.
Agile
Scrum
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Paper illustration of Product Kata with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Product Kata
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries.With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.Product Kata helps clarify customer problems, solution ideas, and evidence through a repeatable improvement routine. It captures direction, current metric, target metric, experiment notes, and learning.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend1-3 h1-2 Wochen je Loop30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10 (Scrum Team)3-103-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint GoalProcess Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogDirection, Current metric, Target metric, Experiment note, Learning reportObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
AgileIterationCadence
ProcessOperationsImprovement
OutcomesDiscoveryLearningIterationCoaching
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods