View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 3-7 | 2-8 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |



