View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Scrum |  Agile Example Mapping |  Decision Making Cynefin Workshop |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 30-60 min | 60-180 min | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 3-7 | 4-20 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |