View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 60-120 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 4-10 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |



