methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scrum with its method-specific working model.
Agile
Scrum
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Purposedifferent
When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries.Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend45-90 min20-40 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10 (Scrum Team)2-83-154-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint GoalAssumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanROAM Board, Owner ListDecision Rights Matrix, Agreement
Tagsno overlap
AgileIterationCadence
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
Add more methods