View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Scrum |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 1-3 h | 90-180 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 1-8 | 4-12 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | SensemakingDecisionRationale | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | RationaleKnowledgeDecision |