View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Systems Thinking Theory of Change |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 2-6 h | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Theory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome Measures | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tags1 shared | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy | ChangeDecisionStrategy | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |