View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Change | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 2-6 h | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Theory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome Measures | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tags1 shared | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |



