View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |