methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Purposedifferent
Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
0.5-2 TageWochen bis Monate je Goal30-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-101-63-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options
Tagsno overlap
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
DecisionTreeOptions
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Add more methods