View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Operations Getting Things Done |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 45-90 min | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1 | 3-8 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |