View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-5 Tage | 45-90 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Nutzertraffic | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |