View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Nutzertraffic | 1-5 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |



