View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Decision Making Decision Tree | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 30-90 min | 10-20 min daily | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-6 | 1 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | DecisionTreeOptions | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |



