View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-5 | 3-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |