methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
30-90 min2-6 h10-20 min daily2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
1-43-1013-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlisteFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityVisualization
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RiskRoot causeSafety
Add more methods