methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Runbook workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Runbook
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Purposedifferent
For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
20-60 min1-2 h15-45 min1-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-44-121-31-4
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Runbook, Checklist, Escalation PathAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
OperationsReliabilityDocumentation
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
Add more methods