View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Runbook | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() Architecture Views and Beyond | ![]() Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | 45-90 min | 1-3 Tage | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Runbook, Checklist, Escalation Path | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | OperationsReliabilityDocumentation | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |



