View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Root Cause Tree Analysis4Ls RetrospectiveFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisRoot Cause Analysis
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Root Cause Tree Analysis | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Operations Root Cause Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45–75 min | 2-6 h | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Team members involved | 3-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Cause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeTreeIncidentQuality | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident |



