View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Working Agreements |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | TeamCollaborationAgile | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |