View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:ROAM BoardSpecification by ExampleFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-6 h | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-6 | 3-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |