View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 h | 60–90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | KnowledgeMappingRisk | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |