View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 2-4 h | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 4-10 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Team API Document | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | JourneyServiceService design | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |